| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
M.Lange Member

Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Posts: 81 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here is what I do to test the strength of the joint:
I do a few passes with the plane and try to pull the shavings apart.
If it separates at the joint rather than anywhere along the grain, it probably is better to start again...
Matthias |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kel Member
Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Posts: 73 Location: Asia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
nice to hear your suggestion, would try this the next day
-----------------------------
this morning planed the joint and checked, looks fine basically
the imperfection also lies on one end and doesn't matter as i'd cut away after drawing the outline _________________ Newbie Maker Kelvin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Chandler Super Member
Joined: 31 Oct 2007 Posts: 691 Location: Mt Mitchell in North Carolina
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:42 pm Post subject: Joining |
|
|
Matthias, good suggestion.
I just joined some fresh back and top wood. Some AAA billets. I did a rubbed/but not clamped back and the outcome was excellent, but had to recut the spruce top three times ending up doing a rubbed then clamped joint. Each time, it appeared to be a perfect joint before gluing up. Not sure why the maple would be so easy and the spruce soo difficult this time.
I'm working in my shop where temperature is only about 60 deg and humidity is only about 15%, so I put the wood in the kitchen oven at 120 for an hour or so, wrap it and take it down to the shop and glue and clamp it before it loses its warmth. Maybe this is my last till spring. Maybe I need to heat it to 140 or so. Cool work environment could be the reason its become difficult to glue up, maybe the maple cools more slowly than the spruce, dunno. _________________ Dave in the Blue Ridge
Southern Violin Association
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to the next with no loss of enthusiasm" Winston Churchill
"I took the road less travelled, and now I don't know where I am." Marco Polo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M.Lange Member

Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Posts: 81 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 9:35 am Post subject: Re: Joining |
|
|
| Dave Chandler wrote: | | I did a rubbed/but not clamped back and the outcome was excellent, but had to recut the spruce top three times ending up doing a rubbed then clamped joint. |
Funny that you mention that, Dave. I didn't have any problems glueing the spruce. But the maple came apart, while I was hollowing the inside of the back.
The glue sinks much more into the maple, at least if it is strongly figured, because you have some amount of "end-grain " there. Also the glue shrinks very much while it is drying. I think my problem was that the glue was too thin.
By the way: I use an hair dryer to warm the wood before glueing.
Matthias |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kel Member
Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Posts: 73 Location: Asia
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
i did rubbed joint for my spruce, so far in hollowing the inside and carving the outer, spruce doesn't separate
still i have some worry on possible spruce separation and i intentionally leave the spruce thicker around the f hole area _________________ Newbie Maker Kelvin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kel Member
Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Posts: 73 Location: Asia
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is it a MUST NOT to use sand paper for either top spruce or maple back? _________________ Newbie Maker Kelvin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack H. Super Member
Joined: 24 Mar 2007 Posts: 346 Location: Israel
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kel wrote: | | Is it a MUST NOT to use sand paper for either top spruce or maple back? |
are you talking about sanding the joint area to be glued?
That is a NO-no!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kel Member
Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Posts: 73 Location: Asia
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jack, my spruce already jointed and is being hollowed
but i don't have finger plane at this moment
at present my trouble is how to plane the curvature along the outline especially the upper bout
the thickness i got now is about 5mm and still a lot to fine adjust
just wonder whether to use sand paper before my finger plane arrives
[/img] http://www.flickr.com/photos/32897962@N03/3070771755/in/photostream/ [/img] _________________ Newbie Maker Kelvin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mikes Member
Joined: 28 Mar 2007 Posts: 80 Location: Vermont, USA
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kel,
It looks like your outline is still rough, if so use a half round bastard file to bring the outline right down to the line (split the line) this can be done before you do any arching, also make sure you figure out your corners before you file to the line, leave them slightly long but to the finished width. And from your picture it looks like you have a ways to go on hollowing your plate, I use a gouge to remove the material to within about 1.5 - 2 mm, then use the finger plane. Don't use sand paper any where that you will later use cutting tools or a scraper on as the sand paper will leave broken off abrasive lodged into the wood which will then dull your tools. Keep at and you'll end up with an instrument to be proud of!
Mike S |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mikes Member
Joined: 28 Mar 2007 Posts: 80 Location: Vermont, USA
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kel,
It looks like your outline is still rough, if so use a half round bastard file to bring the outline right down to the line (split the line) this can be done before you do any arching, also make sure you figure out your corners before you file to the line, leave them slightly long but to the finished width. And from your picture it looks like you have a ways to go on hollowing your plate, I use a gouge to remove the material to within about 1.5 - 2 mm, then use the finger plane. Don't use sand paper any where that you will later use cutting tools or a scraper on as the sand paper will leave broken off abrasive lodged into the wood which will then dull your tools. Keep at and you'll end up with an instrument to be proud of!
Mike S |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kel Member
Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Posts: 73 Location: Asia
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Mike
I deliberately leave a safety margin beyond the true outline to allow for minor error.
I hollow the spruce with little bit with gouge and mainly (over 96%) with 2 small size planes.
I can get the spruce thinner but i would do it in safe mode so as not to get a hole _________________ Newbie Maker Kelvin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kel Member
Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Posts: 73 Location: Asia
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
with limited budget, I possibly would order one finger plane only : round bottom 25mm with 8mm blade
can i have some advice from here before i place order? _________________ Newbie Maker Kelvin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Chandler Super Member
Joined: 31 Oct 2007 Posts: 691 Location: Mt Mitchell in North Carolina
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:02 am Post subject: Graduating |
|
|
Before you get too much further, take your assembled rib garland and trace it onto the back, then add another line inside by 1mm, sketch in block areas, and then graduate right up to those lines. If you haven't put the garland together, you can't know where your edges are going to be.
I use a small gouge, then a scraper with a tight but rounded corner (about a 2mm radius) to get up to those lines. _________________ Dave in the Blue Ridge
Southern Violin Association
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to the next with no loss of enthusiasm" Winston Churchill
"I took the road less travelled, and now I don't know where I am." Marco Polo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kel Member
Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Posts: 73 Location: Asia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
hi
i am still working on my first violin
hollowing the back is definitely a hard job
any suggestion to make it less difficult?
just found a unpleasant measurement :
width of my first violin
upper : 173
middle : 118
lower : 212
can it be tolerated? _________________ Newbie Maker Kelvin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
violinarius Member
Joined: 14 Dec 2007 Posts: 171
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kel wrote: | hi
just found a unpleasant measurement :
width of my first violin
upper : 173
middle : 118
lower : 212
can it be tolerated? |
Most violins are smaller than these measurements you give.
Around these:
upper : 168
middle : 110
lower : 206
Try these links:
http://www.prierviolins.com/prierviolins/DimensionsForViolins.htm
http://www.luthier.co.uk/
Last edited by violinarius on Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:53 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|