| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kubasa Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 212
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DonLeister Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2007 Posts: 383 Location: Richmond, VA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, a friend sent it to me and I skimmed it. I just looked at it again and found the 'conclusion' part luckily. It's a dense piece of number crunching it looks like. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ctviolin Super Member
Joined: 07 May 2009 Posts: 961 Location: Roswell
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:48 am Post subject: Re: Morphological Evolution of the Violin |
|
|
| kubasa wrote: | Did anyone come across or read this article yet?
I'll be honest that I really haven't read it. The topic seems interesting, though. I hope to read it this weekend. It was published Oct. 8 so it's fairly new.
James |
Thanks James.
I also read AT it.
Several times in fact.
It is a well researched and well written piece, obviously the author was interested in whatever point or points he was trying to put forth.
But for me, that's sort of the problem with this piece of writing. There was no real point I could find in the piece, other than there are great number of similarities in violin and string instrument outline and design...
Which thing I already had a knowledge of.
His use of somewhat dense technical terms, often seemed to verge on the pedantic for the sake of pedant ism... There was no need for much of it.
Also his frequent mention of how very many violins he was using for the meat of his figures was a bit unnerving.
I'm thinking that he went to extraordinary lengths to graphically demons-trait EVERYTHING, while saying not much of interest to makers. To theorists, perhaps this presentation is worth reading or studying.
I hope my criticism is not demeaning or problematic for you, and that you may feel free to criticize my criticism's... freely. I know how easy it is to be critical of someone else's work. And I have no great work of my own to point to so, there you go, I'm simply being (perhaps) overly critical.
That's just my nature.
I'm curious what everyone else thought of this piece? _________________ Look,
Listen,
Learn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mat Roop Senior Member
Joined: 24 Mar 2007 Posts: 911 Location: Wyoming Ontario
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like a PHD thesis? I read the conclusion, but for me, there was nothing that struck me as practical or useful.
Cheers, Mat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DonLeister Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2007 Posts: 383 Location: Richmond, VA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with you CT.
I also wondered about how the writer measured the instruments, photos I presume.
Yah, I was hoping for something practical or useful too Mat! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Janito Member
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 114 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think you may be missing an important point.
The author is showing how an algorithm can group violins in clusters based on certain characteristics.
Now assume that you have data on many different violins from many diverse sources, photos, CT scans, measures etc..
Might you be able to generate a "Charles Beare" in silico?
The analysis of Big Data is here, but not yet for violins. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Darnton Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 1347 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
There was someone on the web a few years ago who was "certifying" violins based on photos, matching them via software to a database he'd assembled of the locations of principal points on outlines and f-holes. I seem to remember it was costing a couple of hundred bucks, and he was bragging to have "discovered" a Landolfi violin that didn't look like a Landolfi to me at the time. In general, the idea is a spectacularly bad one to anyone who knows violin making history. _________________ new blog at my site! http://darntonviolins.com/blog
my work sites: http://darntonviolins.com and http://darntonhersh.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ctviolin Super Member
Joined: 07 May 2009 Posts: 961 Location: Roswell
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Janito wrote: | I think you may be missing an important point.
The author is showing how an algorithm can group violins in clusters based on certain characteristics.
Now assume that you have data on many different violins from many diverse sources, photos, CT scans, measures etc..
Might you be able to generate a "Charles Beare" in silico?
The analysis of Big Data is here, but not yet for violins. |
Algorithms are useful for many things and logic and mathematics are very useful, for many things also. I'm not sure that they apply as such, in such a situation as this.
The thinking that rides along such mathematical, and such logical rails, is not the same kind of "logic" that applies or is really workable here with these comparisons.
I believe that this author is talking "apples and oranges", or perhaps its more appropriate to say that he's comparing "apples and skyscrapers".
To what end, I'm still not sure.
Janito, I'm not sure who it is that's missing an important point here. _________________ Look,
Listen,
Learn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Janito Member
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 114 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spectacularly bad idea - perhaps.
Missing the point - perhaps.
Now consider this: apparently unconnected data can point to the identity of a unique individual - the sum being much greater than the component parts. This has led to a huge emphasis on the legal handling of "personally identifiable information" collated by trawling systems.
That would happen with violin-related information if there is ever anyone interested enough to fund the exercise.
We should have this discussion again in 10 years time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Darnton Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 1347 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The problem with violins is that the transmission of this data is not organized, or linear, or sensible. Someone in Poland in 1840 could get a Strad in his hands and if he was smart, copy enough details to convince someone who didn't know enough that it was a Strad.
There was a committee of Swiss police "experts" in the 60s or 70s who put together a series of books based on visible and measurable data points, along with UV and infrared. Their goal was to assemble a set of verifiable examples of the great makers to work from--to show the dumb violin makers how forensic experts could sort it with science. Unfortunately, their books were mostly filled with crap, because violins resist brute force attempts to organize them. Some of my violins look more like Strads in many more features than some Strads I have seen, for instance.
The art world has the same problem. There are personal issues much more subtle than machines can pick up. Janito, did you see the Rembrandt and fakes show at the NC Museum of Art? I went and it was wonderful. A mix of real and fake. About 1/3 of the way through, I started to be able to sort them, but I would challenge a machine to do it on the basis that I used. _________________ new blog at my site! http://darntonviolins.com/blog
my work sites: http://darntonviolins.com and http://darntonhersh.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Janito Member
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 114 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | The problem with violins is that the transmission of this data is not organized, or linear, or sensible. |
All valid points.
And to add to them, please watch the great Orson Welles film "F is for Fake". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ctviolin Super Member
Joined: 07 May 2009 Posts: 961 Location: Roswell
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Janito wrote: |
And to add to them, please watch the great Orson Welles film "F is for Fake". |
I did read the on-line information about this film, and it sounds like a worthwhile film to watch, Janito. I'll have to get back to you on this one, as I do not believe that I've seen it before.
Now I have to go to Hastings and look for the DVD.
Orson Welles... what an "odd" guy he was. _________________ Look,
Listen,
Learn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kubasa Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 212
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I FINALLY sat down and read the article. I guess I didn't walk away with anything like others mentioned. I picked up a lot more from the subsequent postings after mine in this thread than the article!
James |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|